Twitter Updates

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Edwards drops out

From MSNBC:
Democrat John Edwards bowed out of the race for the White House on Wednesday, saying it was time to step aside “so that history can blaze its path” in a campaign now left to Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama.
I'm not sure what sort of an impact this has on the race. Of course Barack Obama seems like the natural safe haven for erstwhile Edwards supporters, but I've read arguments and seen statistics that seem to suggest that isn't true. It's an oversimplification to say that the Edwards people will gravitate towards the other "change" candidate--Edwards constituency was much more complicated than that. Many of them are populist-minded middle class and upper class folks who will probably lean towards Obama, but the working class folk who were attracted to Edward's promise to fight for their interests have proven to be Hillary supporters in the previous four primaries. I think that, barring an endorsement either way, Edwards supporters will break about even for the remaining two Democratic candidates.

What's interesting is that, in case of a brokered convention, Edwards may retain considerable "king-making" power. Though he's suspending his campaign, he is still on the ballot in many states, and will still gain delegates through Super Tuesday and beyond. If we don't have a nominee by the time the party rolls into Denver, Edwards may have enough delegates to effectively choose who the nominee will be.

I'm going to Santa Ana to the Orange Country Obama for President office. More on that later.

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Tulo and Me

A mancrush; if you follow sports long enough, follow it with enough devotion, you will eventually—whether or not you fight it—develop one.

If you don’t know what I mean, let me explain. Like most infatuations, a mancrush begins innocently enough. Mine did.

Last year, I played fantasy baseball for the first time. The shortstop I drafted, Khalil Greene of the Padres, was adequate but nothing more. Sure, he had plenty of power for a shortstop, but he couldn’t hit for average and wouldn’t know how to take a walk if a pitch hit him. I needed someone more promising, so I picked up rookie shortstop Troy Tulowitzki.

I was derided for picking him up. I was told that he was a waste of a roster spot, a prospect more likely to be fool’s gold than the real thing.

Then, a strange thing started to happen: he started to hit. I mean hit. He had never flashed any real power during his minor league career, but suddenly, during his first year in the show, baseballs began to fly high into the Denver night with regularity. Writers raved about his defense, his range and great throwing arm. He was praised for his field leadership, even at the young age of twenty-two. People were labeling him the next great shortstop, the next Cal Ripken. By October, he had hit twenty-nine home runs (a record for rookie shortstops) and led his team to a Cinderella run, winning the National League pennant. By then, he was no longer Troy Tulowitzki, shortstop for the Colorado Rockies. By then, he was simply “Tulo” to me. Every home run, every stolen base was more than a few more points for my fantasy team, it was like a personal victory.

I first realized I had a mancrush on Tulo during the World Series. I wasn’t watching the series because it promised to be particularly exciting. The Red Sox are a juggernaught, the best team in baseball, and everyone expected them to easily push past the insurgent Rockies. I was also loath to watch the Sox be the first team to repeat in the new millennium, especially since they had swept past my Angels in the first round. I was watching because I was excited that Tulo was playing in his first World Series.

At this point you may be wondering why Tulo was not merely one of my favorite players, why I had to use the rather extravagant term “mancrush.” The two are similar, I admit, but having a mancrush is much more than having a favorite player—the former is the logical end of the latter. It goes far beyond simply thinking that a player is “awesome” or “cool.” While the interest in a favorite player extends only to that player alone, the affection for a mancrush can spread to anything or everything connected to that player.

Before this past season, I could have cared less about the Rockies. My preferred team is in the American League West. I had, perhaps, a lingering interest in the Dodgers because they are LA’s other team, and because of their exciting core of young players. But after I found Tulo, I was actively rooting for the Rockies to win their one-game playoff against the Padres, for them to push past the Phillies and Diamondbacks. I’ve become interested in the team, and have become familiarized with it to the point where I could talk about them with almost as much fluency as I can the Angels. I know that the Rocks have a good offense (despite holes at catcher and second base), a logjam at third base with Garrett Atkins blocking Ian Stewart, and a need for better starters beyond Jeff Francis and Aaron Cook.

My friend Phil is another example; he has it pretty bad for Dwyane Wade of the Miami Heat. His second favorite team—after the Lakers, of course—is the Heat, mostly because of D-Wade. In 2006, he desperately hoped that the Heat would win the NBA championship (which they eventually did). He had been trying to get a Wade jersey for years before his brother finally got him one as a graduation gift. This may all seem quite normal except for the fact that Phil has virtually no connection to Miami. I don’t think he’s even ever been there, but that won’t matter so long as the Flash still plays for the Heat.

I’m not sure if mancrushes are as gender-specific as the name implies. I once read someone on an Angels blog wonder aloud if women were susceptible to something similar—if they could ever go so far as to wear shirts or jerseys that have another woman’s name (and uniform number) on them. Wouldn’t that be strange: little girls wearing Miley Cyrus or Vanessa Hudgins shirts instead of “Hannah Montana” or High School Musical. I’m not sure if this “mancrush gap” is due to the fact that men are generally more interested in sports than women, or that men’s sports (unfortunately) get more than their due share of attention than their female alternatives. Whatever the reason, I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone wearing a Mia Hamm or Lisa Sparks jersey.

And what ever happened to Tulo? Unfortunately, the Rockies’ fairytale lacked a happy ending, as they ran into the Red Sox buzzsaw like the Angels and Indians before them. Tulo had a less-than-stellar World Series, hitting for a line of 231/333/385. That didn’t matter to the Rockies, though. A week ago they signed Tulo to a six–year, thirty-one million dollar contract—the most ever for a player with only two years of service time. It certainly didn’t matter to me either. As I sit here, at a Starbucks in Laguna Beach with Michael Uy, I am (untentionally and coincidentally, I assure you) sitting here wearing my purple-and-black Troy Tulowitzki shirt. Thanks to the Rockies and the generosity they’ve shown their budding shortstop, I’ll be able to show off my mancrush for years to come.

Sunday, January 20, 2008

Everyone has vices...

...even assistant coaches on the Golden State Warriors. From Rotoworld:

After Matt Barnes was left off Saturday's game roster by assistant coach Keith Smart, coach Don Nelson attributed the mistake to the pay-per-view options at the team hotel.

"Keith Smart left him off because he was watching the adult movie channel and he should have been concentrating on drawing up the roster," Nelson said. "So we're going to take that privilege away from him for the rest of the year." Barnes was forced to watch the game on a TV in the locker room.
It's bad enough to have something like that revealed among your peers and friends, but throughout the whole Bay Area, and through Rotoworld, the whole country?

Saturday, January 19, 2008

What? An inconclusive conclusion?

While Sen. Obama lost the popular caucus vote to Hillary by about 5 points, apparently he won one more state delegate than the New York senator. It's a bit like losing the popular vote but winning the electoral college in November, prompting Chris Matthews to ask Tim Russert, "Well, then, who won Nevada?"

Despite my obvious Obama fanboyness, I'll have to admit that while Hillary won Nevada, this is a welcome development. It means that the race is still close, and Barack still has something of a fighting chance assuming he can blunt Hillary's momentum in South Carolina.

A long way to go

One of the hopes behind the Obama candidacy is that he can help put aside the concerns of identity politics--that politics can finally be about character and ideas instead of skin color or gender. But a trend that began in New Hampshire seems to have continued in Nevada:
Entrance polls indicated Democrats were split along ethnic, racial and generational lines. But women made up nearly 60 percent of those taking part in Saturday's contest, and the New York senator and former first lady led her top rival, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, by a margin of 52 percent to 35 percent among those voters.
For the life of me, I can't understand this. There are a myriad of reasons why someone can support a candidate, but I don't understand how gender or race could be one of them. I'm not trying to imply that all of the women who voted for Hillary did it just because she is a woman, but certainly some of them did.

If anything this shows how much more work we have to do before we will realize Dr. King's vision of judging people not by the color of their skin (or their chromosome count) but by the content of their character.

I am a political junkie

Last night, I was turning on my TV, and before a picture was actually visible I knew that Tucker Carlson was talking just by the sound of his voice. Something is wrong with me.

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Purpose

As much as I don’t like the idea of “about” sections on websites, I’m a firm believer that everything must have a purpose, thus so must this blog.

Most of you who read this already know me, so I won’t waste your time with personal introductions. If you don’t know me and were somehow misled or convinced to make your way here, feel free to browse.

Here goes nothing.

I’ve had several aborted attempts at blogging, and if you looked hard enough you could find the wreckage of those failures. I’m still not sure why I’ve been unable to keep at it. It’s not that I don’t have anything to say—though I’ll admit that I’m not sure I have anything interesting to say. I think, I think I even over-think. I often stay up late at night, hours after I’ve gotten into bed, sitting there thinking. It’s not an enjoyable process. I’ve lately taken to listening to my iPod to try and silence the thoughts. I may be infamous for my owl-like hours, but even I need sleep occasionally. I think writing on this blog, finding some outlet for those thoughts, may help me. So think of this blog as therapy for me as much as anything else.

Perhaps the problem is the medium. As the old communications adage goes, “the medium is the message.” I think the real problem may be that I’m too much of a perfectionist when it comes to my writing. Any thoughts that could travel from my head to other people (without excessively offending someone) requires such a rigorous filtering process that it takes forever for me to write even a few paragraphs I think are presentable. Eventually I get so tired and frustrated with the amount of time it takes to produce something that I give up altogether.

That, to me, is simply not acceptable. I don’t know myself all that well, but I do know that I need to write. I need to. In my personal statement for my law school applications, I wrote that “I love writing, but I love it the way you love a hobby, not the way you love your life’s calling.” While that may be true, it does nothing to diminish the fact that it is an important part of my life. I need to write to keep myself human. I will probably end up in law and politics in my career, two fields notable for their propensity to dehumanize people. The last thing I want is to be some drone filing temporary restraining orders or mindlessly spouting talking points to another talking head. Those things may one day be the prose in my life, but I need some poetry, too.

Not that I think I’m a particularly great writer or that the world somehow deserves to be blessed with my brilliancy. I only think I’m borderline brilliant. I’m at most a decent writer who has yet to really find his voice (for what it’s worth, it seems to be one part snarky and two parts emo). If what they say is true—that most of talent is practice—well, I could use the practice. The only way I’m going to be a better writer is to keep writing.

So I guess this blog is more for me than it is for the people who read it. If somehow what I say interests you, then welcome aboard. If not, well, you know what do with yourself.

Tuesday, January 08, 2008

A year later, and we're hovering

The last time I posted, this blog had a different name, I was still in school, and Barack Obama had just announced his candidacy for the presidency.

My, how things have changed.

Tonight's Iowa shocker is another example of that old political truism: "a year is an eternity in politics." As recently as a month ago, Obama seemed to be little more than a footnote on Hillary's historical march towards the nomination. Then he took Iowa by storm, and for a moment--sadly, just a moment--looked like he was going to be the movement candidate whose victories finally matched the enthusiasm.

Another truism: just as you should never start a land war in Asia, you should never underestimate the Clintons.

I wish I had something terribly insightful to say, but it's going to take some time (read: days) for me to recover. Barack Obama is a once-in-a-generation candidate who has the potential to transform American politics in a way that hasn't been done since 1932. The prospect of losing that chance to the machinations of the entrenched, bloated Clinton machine is a bit depressing to say the least.

In the meantime, I'm going to watch Sweeney Todd.